Showing posts with label Amsterdam 2013. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Amsterdam 2013. Show all posts

Sunday, June 23, 2013

A walk around Flevopark

There had been quite a bit of rain and gloomy clouds but we decided to take a walk around the nearby Flevopark.

View Larger Map

The park borders the main canal from Amsterdam to the Rhine. It is supposedly the busiest canal in Europe.


One of the barges that passed us as we walked beside the canal. This one had to be close to 100 yards long.



A Police boat. The barges move along quite quickly but this was faster.


A house boat being pulled and pushed along.




We are always amused by the cars parked on the barge living quarters.


The cycle path beside the canal which is on the top of a dyke beside the big canal. Walkers need to be careful.


There were a few small cottages in this quiet backwater.




There are just so many waterways in the area, some large and others small like this one. Just to the right outside the photo is the large canal.





It has been a pleasure to see all the flowers here in Amsterdam. 


Yes, there is a bicycle in there somewhere. Marianne had walked by it a couple of weeks before and more of it was visible then. By the end of summer it will have completely disappeared.


There were quite a few cyclists and walkers using this path. We have been very impressed by how so many of the Dutch get around on bikes. We were watching a TV program on congestion in London and couldn't help but think that they needed to replace cars with bicycles to alleviate the problem. And of course, raise the level of fitness dramatically.


Black for pedestrians, red for bicycles.


By now we were in the park proper instead of circling the edges.




This rhododendron still had some flowers but Marianne reckoned it looked better two weeks beforehand. I did not go on the walk because I was resting my feet after the Coast to Coast walk.



The beer garden which we went to shortly after we first arrived. It was crowded back then because it was a lovely hot afternoon. The crowd was definitely absent on this cloudy cool afternoon.



Entrance to the old Jewish Cemetery. I could not see any graves.





One of the parakeets that seem so out of place in Amsterdam. Our exchange family returned home this morning and they said that they originated in the foothills of the Himalayas and somehow came to Europe.


We have been gazing at this print on the wall in the lounge room and wondered what it was. It turns out it is a print of a photograph by Jan Saudek. We really liked the sense of joy on the girls' faces.

So our time has come to an end here in Amsterdam and we have thoroughly enjoyed our time here. We have really been impressed by the relaxed and friendly attitude of the Dutch.

So back to England tomorrow to finish the walk.


Friday, June 21, 2013

Concertgebouw Orchestra

Some of you may know that my prime hobby is listening to classical music and I have been attending concerts regularly since I was 17. Back in 1974 when I was in Europe with a Eurail Pass that allowed me to go anywhere by train, I attended concerts everywhere. One of my favourite orchestras to visit was the Concertgebouw in Amsterdam and I was keen to revisit them during our house exchange.

Fortunately there was a good concert scheduled while we were here and on January 2nd I duly bought two tickets at 25 euros each. Even in January most tickets were sold but I managed to get seats by the middle aisle on the ground level towards the back of the hall. I prefer to be upstairs on the balcony but those seats were gone and I was still quite satisfied with the location.

Enescu - Romanian Rhapsody
Rachmaninov - Rhapsody on a Theme of Paganini (Denis Matsuev)
Prokofiev - Romeo and Juliet
Stravinsky - Firebird

A generous program of spectacular works, it was billed as an introductory concert. No long works from Mahler or Bruckner. The conductor was Mariss Jansons who is their regular conductor.

Back in 2007, the prestigious Gramophone published an article that ranked the world's orchestras and the Concertgebouw came first, an enormous honour. To the shock and horror of Philadelphia, their famed orchestra came in at number 23. More about that later.


We arrived in plenty of time just after they opened the hall to the audience. The hall itself is beautiful with renowned acoustics. This was the view from my seat.


The hall is ringed with the names of famous and some not so famous composers such as Rontgen shown here. 

The hall gradually filled with both musicians on stage and audience. Some European orchestras have a tradition of filing onto the stage together just before the start of the performers. This orchestra came on in dribs and drabs over the course of about thirty minutes. Oddly enough it was the double basses who came on first followed by a clarinet player. In Philly, the first is usually the oboe player, Richard Woodhams, who is already on stage warming up when we get there early. The Dutch oboe player only arrived about five minutes before the start.

The audience was incredibly noisy almost drowning out the sound of the orchestra tuning up. However when the lights dimmed and the conductor walked down the stairs to the podium it became quite silent except of the occasional cough. European audiences are extremely quiet when the music plays.

Back to 2007 and Philadelphia. The afternoon before I read the article from the Gramophone, I had attended a concert at Philly with Michael Tilson-Thomas conducting a Mahler Symphony. The performance was fabulous, everything you could want from a great orchestra. Few orchestras in the world could match that performance. So why was the ranking 23? The answer was their regular conductor, Christoph Eschenbach. You can read about his poor relationship with the orchestra here.

My own view is simple; he is a great musician but he was the wrong conductor for that orchestra, particularly at the time he was hired. I had happened to be present at a concert he conducted in the late 90's and had remembered that the orchestra had not really played for him. They are a fussy orchestra and while they play expertly for all conductors, they only really play their hearts out for a few of them. I was totally crushed and disappointed when the announcement was made. My fears were justified at the subsequent concerts which he conducted. This is a big, powerful, voluptuous orchestra that I liken to a V-12 engine compared to most orchestras that are V-8's, 6's or 4's. He tried to get to get the orchestra to play like a four cylinder. There are times when the music calls for savagery and oomph and he would not let the orchestra loose to do what they do best. The two prior conductors were Muti and Sawallisch, the first the red hot Italien and the latter the German full of tradition and rectitude. The orchestra was ready for the red-hot lover treatment again and they got the cultured wimp.

After two seasons of walking out at the end of concerts feeling angry instead of exalted, I cancelled our subscriptions for a year. The Gramophone article made Eschenbach's continued presence untenable and he effectively resigned. After a long search while Charles Dutoit filled in as conductor, the young Yannick Nezet-Seguin was hired and he is the fire brand the orchestra has needed. His concerts have been really good and his Verdi Requiem from last year knocked everybody's socks off. The hall is now full every time he conducts.

Needless to say, I was interested to see how Philly now measured up to the number one Concertgebouw.

The opening wind solos for the Romanian Rhapsody were beautifully played and immediately I could understand why this hall is renowned for its acoustics. The stage area is relatively tiny and it appears that the musicians are crammed together but somehow it all works. The sound this orchestra produces is much lighter than the dark sound of Philly. Each is fine in its own way, they are different like a blonde is from a brunette. I suspect this piece had not received as much rehearsal time as the others because it was a little rough in places, particularly the violins and it was definitely a low voltage performance.

If you don't know the piece take a look at this and that for a great performance with Celibidache conducting. Or this recorded version with Antol Dorati conducting.

So on to the Rachmaninov. The orchestra vacated the stage while the piano was raised up from under the stage. Marianne remarked that it had to be highly appropriate for Amsterdam where they have to hoist all their large furniture up into the houses.

Denis Matsuev came down the stairs to the stage towering over Jansons. When Jansons stood on the podium his head was then level with that of Matsuev. I had never heard him play before and since he won the International Tchaikovsky Competition in 1998 he should be able to tickle the ivories. He specializes in playing Rachmaninov and you can see a video of him playing the Rachmaninov Rhapsody on a theme of Paganini here 1, 2, 3.

The performance was very good though Matsuev occasionally bangs with his right hand at the loud bits. He certainly knows how to get that melancholy Russian feeling during the slower bits. He is such a powerful player that at times he seemed to overpower the orchestra which played much better in this piece. More rehearsal time, I presume. There was one curious moment which demonstrated the difference between the Concertgebouw and Philly orchestras. If you watch about a minute into the third part of the video, the orchestra repeats the tune that the pianist has just played. Since it is generally recognized that Rachmaninov loved playing with the Philadelphia Orchestra because of its sound, this is a special moment when you hear this piece played in Philly. They have incredible depth and sonority that the Dutch could not match. 

Matsuev then played an encore, the Rachmaninov Prelude Op23 No 5. Here he is playing it at another performance. Of course there was another standing ovation.

If you want to see some dazzling playing take a look at this encore at another occasion when he played in the Concertgebouw.


Now here is a custom that I really liked. At half time they handed out free drinks. We chose the sparkling water over the orange juice but I believe you could also get champers if you were quick enough.

The Prokofiev starts off with an incredible din followed by the sudden quiet of the massed strings. You can see Claudio Abbado conduct it here. This was a good performance and the orchestra was definitely playing better now but the audience did not applaud too much. When I first started going to the Philadelphia Orchestra, Riccardo Muti was the conductor and this was one of those 12 cylinder powerful pieces that was incredibly loud and powerful in the old Academy of Music.

Finally the Firebird. Here you can see Muti conducting Philadelphia back in the 80's I would judge by looking at the personnel in the orchestra at the time. Later we talked about the composition of the two orchestras. Back in 1974 the Concertgebouw was unusual in that it had quite a few women players which it still has. If you look at the Muti video you will see the orchestra was still mostly male. Now it would be close to 50% female with a lot of Asian players. Most of the Concertgebouw players appeared to be white and I suspect Dutch.

There was a blind woman sitting in front of us and she almost jumped out of her seat at the sudden fortissimo about half way into the piece (see 10:58 in the Muti video). It was a pretty good performance and the audience gave it a standing ovation. Again, I noticed a few rough edges and the last note was not quite as precisely together as it should have been.

If all this sounds like I was disappointed in the concert you would be incorrect. The concert could have been a little better but then again I say that about most concerts I go to in Philly. This was not an ideal program to judge an orchestra by except for how well technically they can play. Top orchestras are judged by how well they can play those extraordinary pieces that are very difficult to interpret and require the greatest of conductors. This is where the Concertgebouw excels as well as Philadelphia. If you have a lot of time, take a look at this video of the Concertgebouw conducted by Jansons in Mahler's 2nd symphony. One of my favourite movements in all of music starts at 24:40.

So this has been an unusual blog for me, but now you know what I am passionate about.

One of the nice, thoughtful things that really impressed me was that your concert ticket could be used as a ticket on the trams and buses up to three hours before and after the concert. The concert started at 8:15 and so we caught a tram about 5:30 and had dinner at an Indonesian restaurant near the hall. On the way home, a group of plain clothes ticket inspectors got on the tram and our concert tickets were fine. It was all very civilized.

As a last item, the Concertgebouw is going to Australia later this year where along with other pieces they will be playing the Firebird. Note the prices of the seats. No Robin, save your money for the $10 rush tickets at Philly when you come home.









Wednesday, June 19, 2013

Maritime Museum

Marianne had expressed a desire to go to the Maritime Museum and since her wish is my command, off we went. The 22 bus stops close by.


The museum is housed in a former naval warehouse constructed in 1656.  



The first thing you notice as you enter the building is the ceiling of the courtyard.


The ceiling was so unexpected it took my breath away.


There are four wings to the museum but only two really suitable for adults. The entrances to these wings have ceilings with huge wooden beams.



As an Aussie I am interested in the history of discovery and exploration of Australia. We tend to forget how powerful and far reaching the Dutch were centuries ago. Consider that this globe is almost 400 years old.







Some globes appeared to be less accurate than others.




A later globe (post 1770) showing the east coast of Australia.



I loved the plastic knives and forks next to the incredibly valuable plates.



Made of silver.



It gives you an idea of how wealthy Holland was in those days.


Models of ships. 



If anybody knows what the big flap on the side of the boat is for, please comment or send me a message. These flaps are common on sailing vessels in the Netherlands.


The building is old but the modernization has worked very well.


Figureheads for the prows of ships.






The boob collection of figureheads. 



Compasses with iron attachments to counter the effect of steel in the boat.



A sextant.


The room with the sextants and compasses was dark with lights to represent the stars. It was quite magical.


Marianne described this as a Harry Potter book. It was clear but as you touched the corner, it came to life.



As you might expect from a land of famous painters, there were a few rooms of paintings of ships, usually in battle with the English or Spanish.



I liked the outrageous waves in this painting.



Both Marianne and I have really enjoyed the pen and ink paintings. By the way, I took these photos with higher definition so clicking on them will show more detail.


I was fascinated by this staircase. It seems to have no supports.


We went outside to tour the replica of an old sailing vessel.




It's a large ship. Note the two levels of windows at the stern.


Sleeping quarters for the sailors.


Notice the violin tucked away. Apparently most sailors had very few possessions other than the clothes they wore. They also did not bathe.



The massive beam attached to the rudder.



There was plenty of room but I imagine it would be pretty crowded with over 200 people on board along with the cargo and provisions. Fortunately the ceilings were not too low in this section.


Dinner table for the captain, officers and passengers.


The captain's quarters. They were quite spacious.


His toilet.


The kitchen.



The ship's steering wheel.


Beds for passengers.


The level below the captain's quarters. The ceiling was very low here.


The prow with its figurehead.





Views of the harbour and Amsterdam skyline from the ship.


Old steam powered ship tied up to the same wharf. Unfortunately you could not board it to look around. 



There was one more section to look at that focused on modern trade moving through the Amsterdam port. This display showed the harbour and vessels moving though it. There is something similar on the web that we use to find out what vessels are going past our house at home in North East.


A sign announced that there would be some sort of special show in a couple of minutes so Marianne and I sat and looked at this steel wall along with a few other people. Eventually a door opened and we all filed into a room with screens on each of the four walls.


The door closed and a video was displayed on the four screens that made you feel like you were in a helicopter flying over the harbour. It was really quite effective and I noticed that I swayed back and forth as the helicopter banked and turned.


I noticed this boardroom on the way out.

We both enjoyed the museum. It costs 15 euros to enter, the same as the major art museums. I would not say it is their equal in quantity but a lot of thought has gone into making this museum interesting. As the old guidebooks used to put it, worth a detour for a couple of hours.


Finally a bit of colour from a hedge by the bus stop.